Subject	Furthermore, I took the perspective of NA 2+0 vs NA 2+2
Posted by	Dave N on February 13, 2013 at 7:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 110 times.
In Reply To	Not when you add two passengers in the back seat. (n/m) posted by Dave N on February 13, 2013 at 07:06 PM
Message	Since the OP hasn't listed what type of car he has, it's impossible to know if he was comparing TT vs NA 2+2, or NA 2+0 vs 2+2. :-) Things are going well - just maxed out on my bandwidth at the moment. Dave This car is probably owned by a snowboarder. Sig Quotes: "I JUST saw your polls post" email from BigTDogg on March 24, 2009 in reference to this polls post from Jan 7, 2009. "Your sausage scares me!" - TT-XTZ 6/13/05 "Or he's having a rough week like the rest of us and decided to take out his agressions of not being breast fed on me." BigTDogg 15:45, 09/25/03 "Pick her up from day care and take her to Dairy Queen for a snow cone." YugoBernie 1/7/04 of course those are canadian bannings and beatings, which after the conversion rate is really only a "hey! stop that!" Chris(NJ) 1/14/04 see the green "n" next to my name? what's COZ? (n/m) - 300zx88 8/11/04
Follow Ups	2 and 4 seater rear shocks different? - Project_Broke 13:07:47 02/13/13 The 2+2 is a heavier car, thus requiring different valve - Dave N 15:25:06 02/13/13 Hi Dave. Actually the 2+0 TT is heavier than the 2+2 NA - ZXRider 17:31:43 02/13/13 Thanks guys. Just was bothering me. (n/m) - Project_Broke 19:02:48 02/13/13 Not when you add two passengers in the back seat. (n/m) - Dave N 19:06:03 02/13/13 Furthermore, I took the perspective of NA 2+0 vs NA 2+2 - Dave N 19:30:14 02/13/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.